Posts Tagged - legal-tech

Using design patterns to build and maintain the Rule of Law

L Diver, (2024) ‘Using design patterns to build and maintain the Rule of Law’ 3(2) Digital Society 30. View online

Abstract

Law is, and has, an architecture. This article investigates that architecture by reference to the idea of ‘pattern languages’, as described in Alexander, Ishikawa, and Silverstein, A Pattern Language (OUP, 1977). Such ‘languages’ are combinations of design patterns, operating at multiple levels of abstraction and interlinking with one another to form a ‘fabric’ that constitutes the broader practice or enterprise. Applied to the legal domain, we can similarly identify patterns that operate at various levels, brought together into the idealised pattern language of legality and the Rule of Law. The article attempts to deconstruct the Rule of Law into its components. It presents two visual schemas showing those patterns and their dependencies, an initial narration of a selection of them, and example of how to ‘read’ the language. The goal is to provide a mechanism to assess which Rule of Law elements are present (or not) in a given instance, and also to identify what was absent in cases where we feel the ideal has failed to live up to its promise. It is also intended to contribute to the development of ‘legal tech’, by offering a mechanism of translation between Rule of Law values and software development practice. Ultimately, the goal is to foster legal and digital architectures that respect, sustain, and even strengthen legality and the Rule of Law.

(Open access pre-print here: https://osf.io/preprints/socarxiv/587zd. The publisher’s final version is available here)

A graph schema representation of the Rule of Law's architecture

Read More

Legal Technologies and the Effect on Legal Effect

In February 2023 I was invited to a research seminar at the University of Helsinki’s Legal Tech Lab.

The title of my talk was “Legal Technologies and the Effect on Legal Effect”. The talk was about the concept of ‘legal effect’, which is core to the nature of what law is and how it works, and how legal technologies might have an impact on that concept.

It connects in with all the theoretical work I’ve been doing with COHUBICOL, with a practical and forward-looking twist: how do actual technologies and digital systems mediate the force and the nature of law? This research interest goes right back to the first publication from my PhD, ‘Law as a User: Design, Affordance, and the Technological Mediation of Norms’.

Challenges of mapping 'legal effect' into the computational domain
Some challenges of mapping 'legal effect' into the computational domain.

Read More

Typology of Legal Technologies

L Diver, P McBride, M Medvedeva, et al., (2022) ‘Typology of Legal Technologies’ (COHUBICOL). View online

Abstract

The Typology is an online, interactive publication, a methodology, and a mode of analysis. Substantively, it contains a curated set of typical legal technologies (applications, scientific papers, and datasets). The COHUBICOL team assessed these based on the claims made by their developers and/or providers, and on the substantiation of those claims, with an eye to the kind of legal impact their deployment might have. Our particular focus is on systems that might alter or impact the concept of legal effect that lies at the heart of law-as-we-know-it.

Me presenting the Typology of Legal Technologies at the CRCL22 conference
Me presenting the Typology of Legal Technologies at the CRCL22 conference.
Watch a recording here.

Read More

Argument by Numbers: The Normative Impact of Statistical Legal Tech

L Diver and P McBride, (2022) ‘Argument by Numbers: The Normative Impact of Statistical Legal Tech’ Communitas. View online

Abstract

The introduction of statistical ‘legal tech’ raises questions about the future of law and legal practice. While technologies have always mediated the concept, practice, and texture of law, a qualitative and quantitative shift is taking place: statistical legal tech is being integrated into mainstream legal practice, and particularly that of litigators. These applications – particularly in search and document generation – mediate how practicing lawyers interact with the legal system. By shaping how law is ‘done’, the applications ultimately come to shape what law is. Where such applications impact on the creative elements of the litigator’s practice, for example via automation bias, they affect their professional and ethical duty to respond appropriately to the unique circumstances of their client’s case – a duty that is central to the Rule of Law. The statistical mediation of legal resources by machine learning applications must therefore be introduced with great care, if we are to avoid the subtle, inadvertent, but ultimately fundamental undermining of the Rule of Law. In this contribution we describe the normative effects of legal tech application design, how they are potentially (in)compatible with law and the Rule of Law as normative orders, particularly with respect to legal texts which we frame as the proper source of ‘lossless law’, uncompressed by statistical framing. We conclude that reliance on the vigilance of individual lawyers is insufficient to guard against the potentially harmful effects of such systems, given their inscrutability, and suggest that the onus is on the providers of legal technologies to demonstrate the legitimacy of their systems according to the normative standards inherent in the legal system.

Read More